Why Orlando Cabrera is a Terrible Idea.

Posted by Nick on 2:55 PM




In Jeff Blair's most recent blog post, he mentions that the Jay's are trying to showcase Rolen and Overbay, to try and dump some salary. This is all fine and dandy. Although Rolen is earning his salary for the most part, the injuries really hurt his reliability on the field. And despite Overbay's solid defence I still have doubts about him bouncing back from the wrist injury he suffered a few years ago, and I don't know how well he'll be able to perform this year.

Blair also says that the Jays are trying to clear salary to sign Orlando Cabrera. Wait wait wait, Orlando Cabrera the guy who hasn't posted an OPS higher than .750 since 2003? Yeah that guy. Is it really worth going after him when you have Scutaro, who is a solid player, albeit not as good as Cabrera, but still almost as good (Scutaro was worth 2.8 wins last year, compared to Cabrera's 3.7).

On one note, Cabrera would come on the cheap, you know with this end of the world economy and what not. But he would almost certainly require a 1 year deal, with hopes of getting a better contract next season, but he would also mean giving up our 1st round pick. The Jays in no way shape or form, should give up their 1st rounder, in order to sign a 1 year rental player, who isn't all that good. It's just foolishness.

If the Jays are able to move Overbay or Rolen's contract, I'm not really sure who they would sign. Cabrera is useless, Ramirez would be awesome but he'd still take $25m+/year, and everyone else is a replacement level bench player. The only thing I can think of is saving some money to add a guy during the season through a trade when teams are being hurt even more by the economy, but that would mean surviving with the corners being manned by Bautista and Millar (PLAYOFFS!).

A Few Links...

5 comments:

Comment by Ian Hunter on February 28, 2009 at 4:04 PM

I think the Jays would have to give up too much to sign Cabrera. I don't really think he's much of an improvement anyway, and the Jays would only sign him for 2 years max. Not worth giving up Rolen, Overbay and League.

 
Comment by Nick on February 28, 2009 at 4:08 PM

Giving up League especially is a major no no. Im fine with giving up Frasor, Tallet, Camp, or Wolfe, but League is off limits.

 
Comment by Ian Hunter on February 28, 2009 at 8:46 PM

Definitely. I would say that out of all the arms in the bullpen, Accardo, Carlson, League, and Downs should not be trade bait. Any of the other guys we can afford to deal.

 
Comment by Nick on February 28, 2009 at 8:56 PM

I might be willing to give up Carlson. He's coming off an amazing year, but he came out of no where to do it. If the Jays FO and management doesn't feel he can replicate what he did last year, it could be a good idea to explore some trades involving him and try to sell high.

 
Comment by Navin Vaswani (@eyebleaf) on February 28, 2009 at 11:50 PM

This is all so fucked up. I don't know why we can't all just be happy with Scoot and McGlovin.

And I'd still rather have Rolen and Overbay in my opening day lineup.

We gotta believe. Although Rolen's contract is fucked up, especially if he's not healthy.

 

Post a Comment